| |
So
why is Paul going back to the same issue (the inner
turmoil) in the present tense when he has already settled
it in chapter six? Did he not conclude the section by
saying, 'You have been set free
from sin and have become
slaves to righteousness'?
So
one wonders if Paul is now describing another group
of people in chapter 7. Before, he talked about the
experience of those who struggle but find Christ at
the end. Now, he seems to be talking about those who
still need to find Christ?
Let us look at the key points in this passage (vv. 14-25).
I do not do what I want to do. Instead what I hate I do.
Paul talks about his (or someone else's) inability to
guide himself to doing what is right. It is clear that
he has the right intention: "I want to do what
is right." But the fact of the matter is that he
cannot: "Instead what I hate I [end up] doing."
Why? He blames it on 'sin living in me' (vs. 17) in
his 'sinful nature' (vs. 18). It is 'sin living in me
that does it' (vs. 20).
After all, he says 'he is unspiritual and sold as a
slave to sin' (vs.14) and 'the prisoner of the law of
sin' (vs. 23). Rather a strong expression, isn't it?
Do you think this is a description of a Christian, whether
a person is mature or not in his walk with the Lord?
Anyway, the key point here is that Paul finds it impossible
to listen to the demands of the law, even though the
law itself is spiritual (vs. 14) because he is not spiritual.
He is really caught between the rock and a hard place.
I am a wretched man in need of a rescue from this body.
So he comes to the end of the rope, so to speak. He
realizes how spiritually and morally bankrupt he is.
He knows that he can never be righteous by obeying the
commands of the law. He screams, "who can rescue
me from this body of death?'
Thanks be to God through Jesus our Lord
After the cry, he knows where to find the answer: 'Thanks
be to God --- through Jesus Christ our Lord.' This is
nothing new. He talked about this in chapters 5 and
6. He may be repeating what he said earlier,
When we were powerless, Christ died for us (5:6)
While we were still sinners, Christ died for us (5:8)
Two
views on 7:14-25
Here is the problem: Is Paul referring to the unregenerate
state or the regenerate state here? Is this Paul before
he met Christ? Or is this Paul after he met Christ?
You might say at this point, 'well, pastor, what difference
does it make?' Well, I would say that this is important
for understanding our Christian life. If our Christian
life was meant to be like what Paul is describing here,
then we would have a lower expectation on ourselves.
If, however, this does not describe a normal Christian
life, then we also need to understand why we feel the
inner struggle from time to time.
This passage has had a long interpretative history.
Throughout church history people have taken two different
positions on this passage.
The argument in favor of the
Regenerate
This position was held by Augustine, Luther, Calvin,
and more recently, Cranfield and Morris. Here are some
points for support:
- The
use of the present tense in this section, to draw
a clear distinction from the previous passage which
was Paul's former way of life described in the past
tense (vv. 7-13).
- The
frequent use of the emphatic ego (six times) here,
no doubt referring to Paul's personal past.
- Paul's
view of the past (pre-Christian) does not match this
passage. Before, he would describe himself as 'faultless'
(Phil 3:6).
- Christian
life is the main theme in Rom 5-8. There is no need
for Paul to discuss the unregenerate here.
- The
unregenerate man could not direct his will to the
good as is the case in this passage (vv. 18,19,21).
The
passage is about a Christian who has his ups and downs.
Here, Paul describes a defeated Christian struggling
with sin. Vs. 24 is then the Christian's calling out
to God for help (part of the sanctification process).
The argument in favor of the
Unregenerate
In the early church, this was the prevalent view though
it was abandoned during the Reformation time. It was
held by German Pietists like Franke and also John Wesley
(Methodists). More recently, it is held by Althaus and
Moo.
- The
expressions, 'sold as a slave to sin' (vs. 14b) and
'a prisoner of the law of sin' (vs. 23) hardly speak
of the normal Christian life. Sin is not defeated
here. What then was the work of Christ for? It contradicts
6:14, 'sin shall not be your master.'
- The
Christian life is primarily one of peace, not of inner
conflict.
- The
presence of the Spirit is the distinct mark of a Christian.
There is no mention of the Spirit here.
- Why
would a Christian cry out for a rescue in vs. 24 when
he has been already delivered from the condemnation
of sin? (5:1ff.)
- The
description of the victorious Christian life in chap
8 is set against the life of an unbeliever in chap
7.
This
passage then likely describes a Jew who is under the
law. He knows the requirements of the law, but finds
himself unable to obey the demands of the law due to
his weakened self (combination of the sinful nature
and the sin living in him). Vs. 24 is the unbeliever's
coming to know Jesus Christ as his Savior and Lord (justification).
The problem of the first approach (that this is an
experience of a Christian)
I used to think that this refers to the description
of the 'carnal' Christian, the one who says he believes
in the Lord but does not act like one. Yes, the carnal
Christian is the one who is in the driver seat of his
own life and not letting Christ control his life.
However, I am now thinking differently. If you examine
this passage carefully, you will notice that the description
of the Christian here is:
- Too
depressing - a very dark description of a Christian
life
- Too
regressive - when are we going to move on? Have we
made no progress as a Christian?
- Repeating
the phrase - people accept Christ into their hearts
many times like the ones who go to crusades and prays
to receive Christ each time 'just to be sure')
This
cannot be a normal Christian life. That is why I think
it makes more sense to believe that this passage is
about someone who wants to live a holy life but who
cannot due to the sinful nature he finds in himself.
What is described here, instead, is a life dictated
by rules and laws, from which a person cannot possibly
escape. Like a spider web, these rules and laws continue
to trap people in. This is certainly not the life that
is led by the Spirit. Notice how the phrase 'Spirit'
is not found in this passage. How can we say this is
the experience of a Christian when there is no mention
of the Spirit guiding us into all truth?
That is why I am inclined to believe that this does
not describe a normal Christian life. Rather, it describes
the struggle of a religious person who wants to live
right but does not have the proper help to live like
that, the help from the Spirit. John Stott calls them
'the Old Testament Christians.'
How about our own experience?
But some of you might say, 'well, wait a minute. I do
experience this inward struggle that Paul talks about
here, in my own Christian life.'
True, from time to time, we will experience life under
tension because we want to do our own thing and the
Spirit leads us in a different way. But such a tension
is only temporary. In the face of temptation, we pray,
resist and even fall to sin from time to time. But that
is not the same as 'living in slavery to sin.' We are
aware of sin and the sinful nature in us. But we are
also each day being delivered from the power of sin
because of the Spirit who lives in us. In other words,
we are the people of the Spirit, and where there is
the Spirit, there are freedom and self-control.
What kind of lesson does Romans 7 give to us?
If Paul is here speaking on behalf of the devout Jews
(who delight in the law, but who finds themselves powerless
to obey the law), what possible message does this give
to us, Christians?
If we as Christians approach Christian living like the devout Jews approach their religion, then we will
experience a similar inner struggle.
Many Christians have a way to turn the grace of God
into the law of legalism. We make the gospel message
into some kind of lifeless gospel formula. Instead of
freedom and passion, we have legalism and guilt.
I heard of one missionary who refuses to go to the movies.
She finds it unhelpful to her spiritual life. So, even
if there is a movie by Walt Disney, she will not go.
But what I have difficulty understanding is that she
will buy DVDs and VCDs to watch at home. So, my conclusion
is that she finds the movie threaters troubling, not
the movies. But do you see my point how easy
it is to fall into the trap of legalism?
Our Christian life should be marked by 'walking in the
Spirit.' We are not under the law (as in rules) but
under the dynamic leading of the Spirit and in obedience
to His leading. This is what Paul speaks on in the following
chapter (Life in the Spirit)s. Walking in the Spirit
does not mean doing whatever we want. It means yielding
our life to the control and leading of the Spirit. We
need to experience on a daily basis how 'through Christ
Jesus the law of the Spirit of life set me free from
the law of sin and death' (8:2).
Let us ask,
- Are
there any lawful elements in your Christian living?
Is your life full of 'shoulds' and 'don'ts'? We should
not be tied up by rules and regulations to the point
that we no longer see our new relation with Christ.
- How
well are we aware of the leading of the Spirit in
our lives? When we sin, let us pause for a minute.
We should not be surprised that we sin. But we need
to recognize that sinning is not in God's will. Instead,
let us humbly ask God for the forgiveness of our sins
and the grace to move on. Let us ask God that we may
have more patience on ourselves and others around
us.
May
the LORD bless you always and keep you in His Goodness!
|
|